Table of Provinces and Member Churches in relation to the Covenant
Please note: this
is no more than my best guess today. A number of factors add to its
unreliability, not least of which is that I can only go on publicly available sources and reported comments.
- It's not clear how much persuasion to sign is being applied by the ACO and others – my guess is a lot.
- It's not clear what the impact (if any) of the English vote against will be. I guess it might be of some help to those who wish to resist persuasion, but will probably not make a lot of difference to the basic decision.
- There seems little reliable link between earlier critiques in official statements and the final vote (cf. Wales).
- I have no way of judging any province's internal politics (cf. Japan).
- I don't know whether the final revision to Section 4 will be sufficient for those churches (or their states) which I believe to have constitutional barriers to signing.
- There is a good chance that a number of provinces simply won't come to a decision for a long time. Some (Nigeria?) will quite possibly ignore the question altogether.
- I've marked a quarter 'Don't know' which is a very high proportion of the final vote.
Overall I think that, assuming the Covenant isn't
wholly dead, this is probably too optimistic (from my perspective). I would guess that 19 might be close to
the maximum for the 'No' camp - and may itself be optimistic.
I've not included a separate category for 'still in the process of considering the Covenant'. I guess this is where the ACO will put England for some time to come. This would imply that it would be possible for a Church to flip from 'No' to 'Yes' and vice-versa.
I will update the table as information - or hints - come in. Contributions (especially evidenced) very welcome. Please leave a comment on any blog post or email paulbagshaw@gmail.com.
I've not included a separate category for 'still in the process of considering the Covenant'. I guess this is where the ACO will put England for some time to come. This would imply that it would be possible for a Church to flip from 'No' to 'Yes' and vice-versa.
I will update the table as information - or hints - come in. Contributions (especially evidenced) very welcome. Please leave a comment on any blog post or email paulbagshaw@gmail.com.
Overall:
Confirmed
No
|
Probable
No
|
Constitutional barriers
|
Probable Yes
|
Confirmed
Yes
|
Qualified Yes
|
Don't know
|
2
|
13
|
4
|
8
|
5
|
2
|
10
|
Total: 19 (43%)
|
Total: 15 (34%)
|
Total: 10 (23%)
|
||||
Provinces: 17,
Member Churches: 1
|
Provinces: 14,
Member Churches: 1
|
Provinces: 7
Member Churches:3
|
My guess by Province and Member Church
Church
|
Comment
|
|
P
|
The
Church of England
|
|
P
|
The
Episcopal Church in the Philippines
|
|
Church
|
Comment
|
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand & Polynesia
|
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church of Australia
|
Dioceses are beginning to vote no.
|
P
|
Igreja
Episcopal Anglicana do Brasil
|
Opposed to Covenant in early days
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church of Canada
|
|
P
|
Hong
Kong Sheng Kung Hui
|
Opposed to Covenant in early days; also possible constitutional issues; I suspect they've been badly treated too.
|
P
|
The
Episcopal Church in Jerusalem & The Middle East
|
Bishop Anis resigned from SCAC as too weak.
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church of Korea
|
Earlier comments about Covenant as a colonial tool.
But +Victoria Matthews reported to have visited recently
|
P
|
The
Church of Nigeria (Anglican Communion)
|
I don't think will want anything to do with the Communion as it is at present
|
P
|
L'Eglise
Episcopal au Rwanda
|
G.
Conger, October 2010
|
P
|
The
Scottish Episcopal Church
|
Most dioceses have said no
|
P
|
The
Church of the Province of Uganda
|
I don't think will want anything to do with the Communion as it is at present
|
P
|
The
Episcopal Church (USA)
|
Executive Committee opposed. To be debated at this summer's General Convention. Cf. Mark Harris.
|
M
|
The
Lusitanian Church (E-P to the Archbishop of Canterbury)
|
Opposed to Covenant in early days; not sure what
freedom of action they will feel they have
|
Church
|
Comment
|
|
P
|
The
Church of Bangladesh
|
A guess
|
P
|
The
Church of North India (United)
|
|
P
|
The
Church of Pakistan (United)
|
A guess
|
P
|
The
Church of South India (United)
|
|
Church
|
Comment
|
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church of Burundi
|
Archbishop
Bernard Ntahoturi chair of IASCUFO
|
P
|
The
Church of the Province of Central Africa
|
Bishop James Tengatenga chair of ACC; much support for Zimbabwe; Bp Botswana very pro-West
|
P
|
Province
de L'Eglise Anglicane Du Congo
|
To ratify Covenant at next General Assembly
|
P
|
The
Nippon Sei Ko Kai (The Anglican Communion in Japan)
|
|
P
|
Anglican
Church of Southern Africa
|
Archbishop Makgoba committed. With dioceses now, return for
ratification in 2013
|
P
|
The
Church of the Province of the Indian Ocean
|
In 2008 they “were firmly convinced that the
proposal Anglican Covenant is crucial” (response,
pdf), view repeated
2010.
|
P
|
The
Church in Wales
|
Archbishop Barry Morgan changed his tune. Governing
body commended to dioceses for ratification at Governing Body April 2012
|
M
|
The
Church of Ceylon (E-P to the Archbishop of Canterbury)
|
I seem to remember affirmative comments
|
Church
|
Comment
|
|
P
|
La
Iglesia Anglicana de Mexico
|
Apparently by executive action
|
P
|
The
Church of the Province of Myanmar (Burma)
|
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church of Papua New Guinea
|
|
P
|
Iglesia
Anglicana del Cono Sur de America
|
|
P
|
The
Church in the Province of the West Indies
|
Well, not a surprise
|
Church
|
Comment
|
|
P
|
The
Church of Ireland
|
But nothing in Covenant shall override autonomy (not clear how this was formally communicated to ACO, or whether merely reassurance given in debate). TA
|
P
|
Church
of the Province of South East Asia
|
Long preamble effectively demanding the failed
proposals of Primatial governance of the Communion
|
Church
|
Comment
|
|
P
|
Iglesia
Anglicana de la Region Central de America
|
Archbishop Armando Guerra Soria is
much more conservative than his predecessor.
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church of Kenya
|
Possibly a 'No' if it sides with Uganda and Nigeria
|
P
|
The
Church of the Province of Melanesia
|
|
P
|
The
Episcopal Church of the Sudan
|
Has officially recognised ACNA as the Anglican Church in
US
|
P
|
The
Anglican Church of Tanzania
|
|
P
|
The
Church of the Province of West Africa
|
I'd guess 'Yes'; no evidence
|
M
|
Iglesia
Episcopal de Cuba
|
|
M
|
Bermuda
(Extra-Provincial to Canterbury)
|
|
M
|
The
Reformed Episcopal Church of Spain (E-P to the Archbishop of
Canterbury)
|
|
M
|
Falkland
Islands (Extra-Provincial to Canterbury)
|
I'd guess 'Yes' simply on smallness and dependency
|
I think you can no move the Church in Wales to the no box
ReplyDeleteBrian Lewis
sorry typing error - meant to say I think you can now move the Church in Wales to the no box
DeleteBrian,
DeleteI think think I'll leave it for the moment and add a 'waiting to the ACC' comment - or perhaps a separate class.
I think more than one province is likely to pause now till the ACC, though few are likely to say so explicitly.
If the England vote killed the Covenant (which I increasingly think to be the case) then it can only be because support for it was always tepid: it had very little political traction if a hiccup could be followed by it stalling altogether.
But it's not yet overt or explicit and I'm disinclined to count the chickens yet.
Too many mixed metaphors, sorry.